The survey asks questions about the main services that users expect from ORCID, and how the ORCID service should be paid for (e.g. membership fees or fee-for service).
In quick response to the announcement of the survey on Twitter, an interesting discussion started on FriendFeed. Several commenters were worried that ORCID tries to be too much. Their thoughts were nicely summarized in this tweet by Cameron Neylon:
Agree with @ReaderMeter + @mrgunn: @ORCID_Org will be a success when it does amazing things for me and I barely notice it’s there.
The survey is open until October 28, the results will be reported in November.
An ORCID discussion group for researchers
The Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID) initiative is working on a unique researcher identifier for the creation of a clear and unambiguous scholarly record. The initiative is supported by more than 140 universities, research institutes, ...
Announcing the Organization Identifier Project: a Way Forward
The scholarly research community has come to depend on a series of open identifier and metadata infrastructure systems to great success. Content identifiers (through DataCite and Crossref) and contributor identifiers (through ORCID) ...
ScienceCard named Finalist in Mendeley/PLoS API Binary Battle
I’m very proud to report that ScienceCard last week has been named finalist in the Mendeley/PLoS API Binary Battle. Not bad for a project that started only two months ago in a hackathon following the Science Online London conference and is done in my spare time. ...